A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sekhar, Ravi
- Comparative Evaluation of Bus Rapid Transit Routes Using Super Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis
Authors
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247 667, IN
2 Transportation Planning Division, CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi 100 025, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 113, No 07 (2017), Pagination: 1408-1419Abstract
Periodical evaluation of the transit system and its subunits is becoming paramount for improving its performance. This article evaluates the performance of 12 routes of the bus rapid transit system operating in Ahmedabad, India. The performance indices considered in the study were divided into five major types of efficiency, viz. route design, scheduled design, cost, service delivery, and comfort and safety efficiency. Super efficiency data envelopment analysis was used to estimate efficiency scores for each type. Further, composite efficiency of routes was estimated based on analytical hierarchy process technique.Keywords
Analytical Hierarchy Process, Bus Rapid Transit, Data Envelopment Analysis, Route Performance.References
- TCRP Report 165 – Transit capacity and quality of service manual, Prepared for Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, Kittelson Associates, Inc, 2013.
- Tongzon, J., Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis. Transp. Res. Part A, 2001, 37, 107–122.
- Husain, N., Abdullah, M. and Kuman, S., Evaluating public sector efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA): a case study in road transport department, Selangor, Malyasia. Total Qual. Manage., 2000, 11(4/5), S830–S836.
- Chu, X., Fielding, G. J. and Lamar, B., Measuring transit performance using data envelopment analysis. Transp. Res. Part A, 1992, 26(3), 223–230.
- Tone, K. and Sawada, T., An efficiency analysis of public versus private bus transportation enterprises. In Twelfth IFORS International Conference on Operational Research, Athens, Greece, 1991, pp. 357–365.
- Obeng, K., The economic cost of subsidy-induced technical inefficiency. Int. J. Transp. Econ., 1994, 21, 3–20.
- Nolan, J. F., Determinants of productive efficiency in urban transit. Logistics Transp. Rev., 1996, 32(3), 319–342.
- Carotenuto, P., Mancuso, P. and Tagliente, L., Public transportation agencies performance: an evaluation approach based on data envelopment analysis. In NECTAR Conference No. 6, European Strategies in the Globalizing Markets: Transport Innovations, Competitiveness and Sustainability in the Information Age, Espoo, Finland, 16–18 May 2001.
- Boile, M. P., Estimating technical and scale inefficiencies of public transit systems. J. Transp. Eng. ASCE, 2001, 127(3), 187–194.
- De Borger, B., Kerstens, K. and Costa, A., Public transit performance. What does one learn from frontier studies. Transp. Rev., 2002, 22(1), 1–38.
- Kerstens, K., Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies. Transp. Res. Part A, 1996, 30(6), 431–452.
- Oh, M. Y., Kim, S. S. and Kim, M. J., Analyzing efficiency in the Seoul’s urban bus industry using data envelopment analysis. J. Transp. Res. Soc. Korea, 2002, 20(2), 59–68.
- Oh, M. Y. and Kim, S. S., Productivity changes by public transport reforms in the Seoul’s urban bus industry. J. Transp. Res. Soc. Korea, 2005, 23(7), 53–61.
- Karlaftis, M., Investigating transit production performance: a programming approach. Transp. Res. Part A, 2003, 37, 225–240.
- Karlaftis, M., A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2004, 152, 354–364.
- Tsamboulas, D. A., Assessing performance under regulatory evolution: a European transit system perspective. J. Urban Plan. Develop., 2006, 132(4), 226–234.
- Mansha, S. and Parida, M., Comparative appraisal of metro stations in Delhi using data envelopment analysis in a multimodal context. J. Publ. Transp., 2015; doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.18.3.3.
- Seth, C., Konstantinos, T. and Dusan, T., Performance evaluation of bus routes: a provider of passenger perspective. Transp. Res. Part E, 2007, 43, 453–478.
- Lao, Y. and Liu, L., Performance evaluation of bus lines with data envelopment analysis and geographic information systems. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 2009, 33, 247–255.
- Hahn, S. J., Kim, H. and Kho, Y. S., A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency of exclusive bus routes. J. East. Asian Soc. Transp. Stud., 2009, 7, 1–223.
- Tandon, S., Performance measurement of bus routes using data envelopment analysis. Thesis, Master of Urban Planning and Policy, College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 2006.
- Barnum, T. D., Comparing the performance of urban transit bus routes after adjusting for the environment, using data envelopment analysis. A Great Cities Institute Working Paper, UIC Great City Institute, College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2008.
- Hagashimoto, Y., Takada, H. and Kishi, K., Evaluation of bus route efficiency by network DEA including social priority. J. East. Asian Soc. Transp. Stud., 2013, 10, 1323–1333.
- Sun, D., Chen, S., Zhang, C. and Shen, S., A bus route evaluation model based on GIS and super-efficient data envelopment analysis. Transp. Plan. Technol., 2016, 39(4), 407–423; doi:10.1080/03081060.2016.1160582.
- Andersen, P. and Petersen, N. C., A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci., 1993, 39(10), 1261–1294.
- Chowdhari, M. and Joshi, R., Relation between urban Form and BRTS transit use. Paper presented in the Urban Mobility India Conference, 2016.
- Vuchic, V., Urban Transit: Operations, Planning and Economics, John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
- TCRP Report 165 – Transit capacity and quality of service manual. Prepared for Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, USA, Kittelson Associates, Inc, 2003.
- DEA Solver LV8, Developed by Springer: Retrieved from extras. springer.com/2007/978-0-387...4/DEA-SOLVER-LV8(2014-12-05).xlsm; on 15 November 2015.
- Godavarthi, G. R., Chalumuri, R. S. and Velmurugun, S., Measuring the performance of bus rapid-transit transit ways based on volume by capacity ratio. J. Transp. Eng., ASCE, 2014, 140.
- TCRP Synthesis Report 63. A synthesis of transit practice of onboard and intercept surveys technique. Schaller Consulting, Brooklyn, New York, USA, 2005.
- Saaty, T. L., Decision making with the analytical hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci., 2008, 1(1), 83–98.
- Estimating Capacity of Hybrid Bus Rapid Transit Corridor
Authors
1 Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247 667, IN
2 Transportation Planning Division, CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi 100 025, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 113, No 08 (2017), Pagination: 1586-1592Abstract
The main objective of this study is to estimate the capacity of hybrid bus rapid transit (BRT) corridor. By the term hybrid BRT corridor in context to this study, we mean a corridor in which buses have to operate in an exclusive environment as well as in a mixed traffic environment. Capacity is an important parameter to estimate corridor and system performance. Therefore to evaluate the same, Ahmedabad BRT system was chosen in the present study. On the basis of boarding alighting data, the busiest route comprising both segregated (exclusive environment) and unsegregated (mixed traffic environment) stretch was selected. For estimating the capacity, an empirical method was adopted. Bus lane capacity for segregated stretch and unsegregated stretch was estimated as 243 buses/h and 101 buses/h respectively. The overall capacity value of hybrid BRT corridor was minimum of the two, i.e. 101 buses/h. After estimating the capacity so obtained, the effect of mixed traffic environment on overall corridor capacity was observed.
Further, an attempt was made to estimate capacity using conventional Greenshield model on a mid-block section. Following this, the results of two approaches namely, empirical model capacity and capacity using Greenshield model were compared. The capacity obtained at mid-block section of the segregated stretch was overestimated by 19.34% or 290 buses/h compared to that obtained using empirical method (243 buses/h).
Keywords
Hybrid Bus Rapid Transit, Greenshield Model, Population, Traffic.References
- Verma, A., Sreenivasulu, S. and Dash, N., Achieving sustainable transportation system for Indian cities – problems and issues. Curr. Sci., 2011, 100(9), 1328–1339.
- Verma, A. and Ramanayya, T. V., Public transport planning and management in developing countries. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110(5), 914–916.
- Population Census 2011 of India. Retrived from http://www.censusindia.gov.in on 21 March 2016.
- Godavarthi, G. R., Chalumuri, R. S. and Velmurugun, S., Measuring the performance of bus rapid-transit transitways based on volume by capacity ratio. J. Transp. Eng., ASCE, 2014, 140(10), 1–12.
- Thomas, E., Bus Rapid Transit, Presentation at the Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting, Chicago, 2001.
- Hsu, L., Cost estimating model for mode choice between light rail and bus rapid transit systems. J. Transp. Eng., 2013, 20–29; 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000466.
- Arasan, V. and Vedagiri, P., Microsimulation study of the effect of exclusive bus lanes on heterogeneous traffic flow. J. Urban Plan., ASCE, 2010, 136(1), 50–58.
- TRB, Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2013, 3rd edn.
- Siddique, A. and Khan, A., Microscopic simulation approach to capacity analysis of bus rapid transit transitways. J. Public Transp., Spel. BRT Edn, 2006, 9(3), 181–200.
- Fernandez, R. and Planzer, R., On the capacity of bus transit systems. Transport Rev., 2002, 22(3), 267–293.
- Fernandez, R., Results of the microscopic modelling of traffic interactions at stops, junctions and roads for the design of bus rapid transit facilities. Paper presented at the Association for European Transport and Contributors, 2007.
- Reilly, J. and Aros-Vera, F., Estimating capacity of high volume bus rapid transit stations. Paper Presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, National Academics, Washington, DC, 2013.
- Jacques, K. and Levinson, H., TCRP Report 26: Operational analysis of bus lanes on arterials. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2013.
- TRB, Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2003, 2nd edn.
- TRB, Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1985.
- TRB, Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1994.
- TRB, Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2000.
- TRB, Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2010.
- Wright, L. and Hook, W., Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Planning Guide, Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. New York, USA, 2007.
- Gu, W., Li, Y., Cassidy, M. and Griswold, J., On the capacity of isolated, curbside bus stops. Transport. Res. Part B, 2011, 45(4), 714–723.
- Sharma, A., Parida, M., Sekhar, R. C. and Kathuria, A., Capacity analysis of Bhopal BRTS using empirical and simulation model. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 2015, 11, 1575–1593.
- Ortiz, M. and Bocarejo, J., Transmilenio BRT capacity determination using a microsimulation model in vissim. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, National Academics, Washington, DC, 2014.
- Widanapathiranage, R., Bunker, J. M. and Bhaskar, A., A microscopic simulation model to estimate bus rapid transit station bus capacity. Paper presented at the Australasian Transport Research Forum Proceedings, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 2013.
- Siddharth, S. and Ramadurai, G., Calibration of VISSIM for Indian heterogeneous traffic conditions. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci., 2013, 104, 380–389.
- Holstein, W. and Soukup, W., Monte Carlo Simulation. Institute paper 23, Institute of Quantative Research and Economics and Management, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Prudue University, 1962.
- Lownes, N. and Machemehl, R., Sensitivity of simulated capacity to modification of VISSIM driver behavior parameters. Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2006, pp. 102–110.
- Fernandez, R., Modelling public transport stops by microscopic simulation. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol., 2010, 18(6), 856–868.
- Chen, X., Yu, L., Zhu, L., Guo, J. and Sun, M., Microscopic traffic simulation approach to capacity impact analysis of weaving sections for exclusive bus lanes on an urban expressway. J. Transp. Eng., ASCE, 2010, 136(10), 895–902.
- Travel Time Reliability as a Level of Service Measure for Urban and Inter-Urban Corridors in India
Authors
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247 667, IN
2 CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi 100 025, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 114, No 09 (2018), Pagination: 1913-1922Abstract
The present study demonstrates the application and usefulness of travel time reliability as a level of service (LOS) measure for urban arterial and inter-urban highway corridors on Indian roads. For travel time estimation, automatic vehicle license plate number data were collected through TrafficMon system. This system is a fully video-based enforcement system designed to measure the speed of vehicles passing in view of the camera, and read the vehicular license plate number. This system was implemented at the entry and exit side of the identified three study corridors and data were collected during morning and evening peak periods. The data were analysed and various travel time reliability measures were evaluated. The study also attempts to correlate reliability measures such as planning time (PT), buffer time (BT), planning time index (PTI) and buffer time index (BTI) with volume-to-capacity ratio which is the most widely used LOS measure for Indian roads. Analysis of results indicated that at LOS B the travel time of intercity highway was 40–46 sec/km, whereas it was 64–80 sec/km and 75–135 sec/km for urban uninterrupted and interrupted corridors respectively. The planning time for LOS B was more on urban arterial corridors when compared to inter-urban corridor for the same width of the carriageway. The upper limits of LOS B for PT were 132 sec/km and 63 sec/km for uninterrupted urban corridor and intercity highway corridor respectively. Other parameters of reliability like PTI and BTI were also evaluated and their values for different ranges of volume-capacity ratio were presented for identified corridors.Keywords
Automatic License Plate Method, Buffer Time Index, Capacity, Travel Time Index, Travel Time Reliability, Urban Arterial.References
- Asakura, Y. and Kashiwadani, M., Road network reliability caused by daily fluctuation of traffic flow. In Proceedings of the 19th PTRC, Summer Annual Meeting in Brighton, Seminar G, 1991, pp. 73–84.
- FHWA, Travel time reliability: making it there on time, all the time. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 2006; http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/tt_reliability/index.htm
- California PATH, Considering risk taking behaviour in travel time reliability, California Path Program, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2005; http://www.dot.ca.gov/research/researchreports/reports/2005/to_4110.pdf
- Asakura, Y., Travel time reliability. In 3rd Center of Excellence (COE) Symposium, University of Washington, Seattle, USA, 2006.
- Chen, A., Ji, Z. and Recker, W., Effect of route choice models on estimation of travel time reliability under demand and supply variations. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (eds Bell, M. G. H. and Iida, Y.), Pergamon, 2003, pp. 93–117.
- Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 2010, 6th edn.
- SHRP, Incorporation of Travel Time Reliability in to the Highway Capacity Nanual, 2012.
- Roger, P. R. and Elena, S. P., The highway capacity manual: a conceptual and research history, Uninterrupted Flow, Springer, USA, 2014, vol. 1.
- Kittelson, W. and Vandehey, M., Incorporation of travel time reliability into the HCM, SHRP 2 Reliability Project L08, 2013.
- Margiotta, McLeod, Scorsone and Dowling, Travel time reliability as a service measure for urban freeways in Florida; http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/statistics/mobilitymeasures/Task13-ttr4urban.pdf
- Lyman, K. and Bertini, R. L., Using travel time reliability measures to improve regional transportation planning and operations, Transportation research record (2046). J. Transport. Res. Board, 2008, 1–10.
- Ravi Sekhar Ch. Kitazawa, T. Tanabe, J. Suga, Y. and Asakura, Y., Examining travel time reliability on Hanshin expressway network. J. Eastern Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. (EASTS), 2007, 7, 2274–2288.
- Tanabe, J., Asakura, Y., Istuubo, S., Maekawa, T. and Okutan, T., Uncertainty of travel time and route choice behaviour – empirical analysis using probe person data. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Transport Network Reliability (INSTR), 2007.
- Trafficmon system, Kritikal Secure Scan Limited, B-29, Sector 57, Noida, India.
- Chandra, S. and Kumar, U., Effect of lane width on capacity under mixed traffic conditions in India. J. Transp. Eng., ASCE, 2003, 129(2), 155–160.
- MATLAB Software. MATALAB and Simulink for Technical Computing Software, Mathworks Inc, USA, 2012.